Skip to main content

Analyzing Results - 2013/Y-6

 There were eight companies in Group 8 (no 9) in 2013/Y-6:

  • EW 
  • STZ
  • LRCX
  • ALXN
  • MU
  • MCHP
  • AME
  • DE
This is how they each fared from 2014 to 2020 - the year runs from April 1 to March 31st:
 
EW        92%, -58%, 5%, 48%, 41%, -1%
STZ       36%, 31%, 7%, 42%, -22%, -18%
LRCX    27%, 10%, 57%, 60%, -6%, 32%
ALXN    12%, -18%, -15%, -7%, 24%, -34%
MU        11%, -61%, 162%, 82%, -17%, 0
MCHP    5%, 3%, 56%, 27%, -4%, -21%
AME       1%, -4%, 9%, 42%, 12%, -14%
DE          -2%, -9%, 45%, 45%, 24%, -34%

Six Year Return:
  • EW  69%
  • STZ  81%
  • LRCX  355%
  • ALXN  -42%
  • MU  72%
  • MCHP  60%
  • AME  42%
  • DE  68%

What score did each of the above have in 2014/Y-5?

  • EW - 6
  • STZ - 8 (no 9)
  • LRCX - 4
  • ALXN - 8 (no 9)
  • MU - 6
  • MCHP - 5
  • AME - 6
  • DE -5
What score did each have in 2015/Y-4?
  • EW - 5
  • STZ -6
  • LRCX - 6
  • ALXN -5
  • MU - 6
  • MCHP - 2
  • AME - 3
  • DE - 1
What score did each have in 2016/Y-3?
  • EW - 8
  • STZ - 7
  • LRCX - 7
  • ALXN - 6
  • MU - 7
  • MCHP - 5
  • AME - 1
  • DE - 2
What score did each have in 2017/Y-2?
  • EW - 8
  • STZ - 4
  • LRCX - 8
  • ALXN - 6
  • MU - 8
  • MCHP - 7
  • AME - 5
  • DE - 6
What score did each have in 2018/Y-1?

  • EW - 4
  • STZ - 6
  • LRCX - 4
  • ALXN - 6
  • MU - 4
  • MCHP - 4
  • AME - 6
  • DE - 5
What score did each have in 2019/Y (pending)
  • EW 
  • STZ
  • LRCX
  • ALXN
  • MU
  • MCHP
  • AME
  • DE
Observations:
I'm trying to find a guiding principal for this and obviously more testing needs to happen, but tentatively, something like this:
Take a position when the score is high, 8 or 9 or whatever.  Could be seven sometimes too, I'll look into that later.
Hold the position unless one of the following occurs - negative return (or significant underperformance) coupled with a drop in quality of three of more points.

In that case DE would be gone after the first year.  MU and AME would have been gone in the second.

The bottom line with this is we would have wanted to keep all of them except ALXN and maybe AME, given that from April 1, 2014 to April 1, 2020 the S&P 500 returned 48%.  Regardless, however that group of 8 did much, much better than the S&P 500, returning 88%.  So maybe it's just buy and hold once they get a top score?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

11 Reasons Why INVRS is Better Than Excel Alone

If you work with your own investment models you likely use excel to build them, but excel isn’t ideal for many reasons and it costs you in other ways.   First, you need good data and it isn’t just lying around in an easy to import format.   You’re either keying it in yourself or paying money for excel downloads.   When you need data from numerous sources – price information, data from different statements and across multiple years - you must merge it from multiple sheets.   It's a n inefficient process which can lead to data corruption. After all this data is collected and merged, models built and tested, the net result is one statistic for one company.   A stand-alone number without context has limited use.   To be meaningful, you need to compare it to similar companies.       This is just a sample of the challenges.  You need software that overcomes these problems and is designed for investment model creation. Surprise!  This software exists,

NextEra - Good Dividend in the Renewable Energy Sector

NextEra had good results relative to a group of peers in a factor-based analysis. NextEra has an appealing profitability and income profile. Its price momentum looks decent, with a caveat. Its relatively small size (a small mid-cap) coupled with its industry (renewable energy) further weight the odds that this company could be a strong performer in the future. If you want in on renewable energy, we recommend NextEra. The Analysis Overview I created a portfolio of stocks in the alternative energy sector, looking specifically for companies with a market cap over $1B but less than $4B.  This is a sweet spot that offers strong potential for growth but is also substantial enough not to be too speculative. It's my believe that alternative energy is on the ascendance, where as fossil fuels will inevitably decline (NextEra isn't a pure play in this regard however, natural gas assets are part of its portfolio).  If you share this belief and you want exposure to this ma

Back-up for Gold Bulls Seeking Alpha Article

This blog is back up for my Gold Bulls: Eldorado Gold Scores High on Value article on Seeking Alpha. Leverage graph: Valuation Calculation Proven & Probable Resources Production Guidance Contained Gold 000 oz 2019 2020                       2,019 2018 2020 - pandemic adjusted 2020-pre-pandemic  2020 guidance  production costs/oz total cash costs/oz all-in sustaining/oz production costs/oz total cash costs/oz all-in sustaining/oz AEM                    21,585 22039                                 1,680,000                      1,875,000                      1,680,000 735 673 938 765 1050 AGI                       9,726                          445,000 1010 790 1040 AUY                       7,859                          990,000