Skip to main content

Five Good Canadian Dividend Stocks

Five Good Canadian Dividend Stocks

Analysis Methodology

Refer to the blog post of November 27, 2019 for a description of the method used.

Candidates

As of November 27, 2019, the following companies from the universe of all TSX stocks have a dividend yield between  3.54% and 11.80%  and have increased their dividend consecutively for at least five years:
  • AI
  • AQN
  • BCE
  • CGX
  • CM
  • CPX
  • CU.X
  • CUP.U
  • EIF
  • ENF
  • FCD.UN
  • INE
  • IPL
  • LB
  • MFC
  • NA
  • PEGI
  • PPL
  • RY
  • T
  • TCL.A
  • TCL.B
  • TD
  • UNS

Analysis

Dividend Coverage


We're looking for companies with positive coverage and less than 75%.
Possible companies include:
  • RY
  • TCL.A
  • TCL.B
  • NA
  • UNS
  • MFC

Valuation


We're looking for companies equal to or greater than one.
Possible companies include:
  • UNS
  • TCL.A
  • TCL.B
  • CGX
  • ENF
  • IPL
  • LB
  • CU.X
  • MFC
  • CM
  • TD
  • T
  • PPL
  • RY
  • BCE

Total Return


We're going to use a sweet spot criteria of greater than 10% and less than 20%.  Companies include:
  • AQN
  • ENF
  • MFC
  • IPL
  • CU.X
  • TD
  • TCL.A
  • T
  • TCL.B
  • CPX
  • FCD.UN
  • RY
  • CM
  • PPL
  • NA
  • CGX
  • UNS
  • LB
  • EIF
  • BCE

The Trifecta

From a beginning portfolio 99 companies the final five that occupy the centre of this vend diagram are:
  • RY
  • TCL.A
  • TCL.B (low trading volume)
  • UNS
  • MFC
I bought all of them accept for TCL.B today.   So fun to run.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

11 Reasons Why INVRS is Better Than Excel Alone

If you work with your own investment models you likely use excel to build them, but excel isn’t ideal for many reasons and it costs you in other ways.   First, you need good data and it isn’t just lying around in an easy to import format.   You’re either keying it in yourself or paying money for excel downloads.   When you need data from numerous sources – price information, data from different statements and across multiple years - you must merge it from multiple sheets.   It's a n inefficient process which can lead to data corruption. After all this data is collected and merged, models built and tested, the net result is one statistic for one company.   A stand-alone number without context has limited use.   To be meaningful, you need to compare it to similar companies.       This is just a sample of the challenges.  You need software that overcomes these problems and is designed for investment model creation. Surprise!  This software exists,
Post a Comment
Read more

NextEra - Good Dividend in the Renewable Energy Sector

NextEra had good results relative to a group of peers in a factor-based analysis. NextEra has an appealing profitability and income profile. Its price momentum looks decent, with a caveat. Its relatively small size (a small mid-cap) coupled with its industry (renewable energy) further weight the odds that this company could be a strong performer in the future. If you want in on renewable energy, we recommend NextEra. The Analysis Overview I created a portfolio of stocks in the alternative energy sector, looking specifically for companies with a market cap over $1B but less than $4B.  This is a sweet spot that offers strong potential for growth but is also substantial enough not to be too speculative. It's my believe that alternative energy is on the ascendance, where as fossil fuels will inevitably decline (NextEra isn't a pure play in this regard however, natural gas assets are part of its portfolio).  If you share this belief and you want exposure to this ma
Post a Comment
Read more

Analyzing Results - 2013/Y-6

 There were eight companies in Group 8 (no 9) in 2013/Y-6: EW  STZ LRCX ALXN MU MCHP AME DE This is how they each fared from 2014 to 2020 - the year runs from April 1 to March 31st:   EW         92%, -58%, 5%, 48%, 41%, -1% STZ        36%, 31%, 7%, 42%, -22%, -18% LRCX     27%, 10%, 57%, 60%, -6%, 32% ALXN     12%, -18%, -15%, -7%, 24%, -34% MU         11%, -61%, 162%, 82%, -17%, 0 MCHP     5%, 3%, 56%, 27%, -4%, -21% AME        1%, -4%, 9%, 42%, 12%, -14% DE           -2%, -9%, 45%, 45%, 24%, -34% Six Year Return: EW  69% STZ  81% LRCX  355% ALXN  -42% MU  72% MCHP  60% AME  42% DE  68% What score did each of the above have in 2014/Y-5? EW - 6 STZ - 8 (no 9) LRCX - 4 ALXN - 8 (no 9) MU - 6 MCHP - 5 AME - 6 DE -5 What score did each have in 2015/Y-4? EW - 5 STZ -6 LRCX - 6 ALXN -5 MU - 6 MCHP - 2 AME - 3 DE - 1 What score did each have in 2016/Y-3? EW - 8 STZ - 7 LRCX - 7 ALXN - 6 MU - 7 MCHP - 5 AME - 1 DE - 2 What score did each have in 2017/Y-2? EW - 8 STZ - 4 LRCX - 8 ALXN - 6 MU -
Post a Comment
Read more